Dendritic excitations govern back-propagation via a spike-rate accelerometer
Optical constraints on two-photon voltage imaging
Voltage changes are smaller than calcium (most popular functional imaging method in fluorescence microscopy) over a very thin membrane, and they’re super fast, requiring khz sampling rates
"Compared with 1P excitation, 2P excitation requires ∼10^4-fold more illumination power per cell to produce similar photon count rates"
At depths of 300 um you can image just ~12 (!) neurons with GEVIs before running into heating limits
1M neuron GCaMP dataset recorded at ~2 Hz (Ca imaging commonly done at 30 Hz). I think this is the largest 2p functional dataset.
Downsampling the 10 Hz dataset to 2 Hz resulted in 40% fewer reliable dimensions
A fluorescent-protein spin qubit
A method to read out spin-state and measure nanoscale magnetic fields, like nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers but with proteins!
Excite yfp with blue light
Some of the excited electrons cross into T1
Zero-field splitting: T1 sublevels separate out (due to proximity of the two electrons in triplet state)
Pulse of 912 light excites electron into T2 (T2 predicted by modeling, could also say Tn here?)
Electron relaxes back to S1 and fluoresces
Spin state read out with optically-activated delayed fluorescence (OADF) — the efficiency (read out as the delay) of T2 → S1 depends on what spin sublevel it was in before the 912 pulse
To measure B:
First do a sweep of microwaves to figure out what drove flips to spin sublevels → optically-detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) read out with OADF
Then in the presence of a magnetic field, then you do a frequency sweep of microwaves until you detect the OADF signal again. A magnetic field moves these sublevels further apart (Zeeman effect)
You can use the difference between the initial signal and the one in the presence of B to measure B
MagLOV excited with light, creating a spin-correlated radical pair (SCRP), which the authors think is a triplet
B field separates energy levels : Zeeman splitting
This causes a reduction in fluorescence because paths to recombine and move back to singlet then fluorescence are reduced now that the triplet states are spread out
The stronger the B field, the more the sublevels separate and the less fluorescence from recombination because only the T0 sublevel can recombine into a singlet (in the absence of B the triplet sublevels can mix with singlet and recombine)
RF that matches the difference between triplet states leads to increase in fluorescence via restoring mixing
Size of B effects determines RF frequency generates fluorescence → this is how you measure B
Similar to the above paper but using mScarlet + a flavin cofactor / in C. elegans